A list of sources to help you answer your essay is provided below. Do not treat this reading list as exhaustive you can and should do your own research in the library to find additional sources, and you can also build from the references you can find within these readings. You should aim to read and reference at the very least four sources – but the best essays are likely to refer to more.
Clegg, S. R., Kornberger, M., & Pitsis, T. (2015). Managing and organizations: An introduction to theory and practice. Sage.*
Grey, C. (2008). A very short fairly interesting and reasonably cheap book about studying organizations. Los Angeles: Sage.*
Hatch, M. J. (2011). Organizations: a very short introduction (Vol. 264). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Hendry, J. (2013). Management: a very short introduction (Vol. 368). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Lock, E (2003) Postmodernism and Management. London: Emerald
Martin, J. (1990). Deconstructing organizational taboos: The suppression of gender conflict in
organizations. Organization Science, 1(4), 339-359.
McAuley, J., Duberley, J., & Johnson, P. (2007). Organization theory: Challenges and perspectives.
London: Pearson Education.
Postmodern Turn and Organization Studies: SAGE Key Concepts series: Key Concepts in Organization Theory
Structure and Organisation
All essays including this one should start with an introduction, which outlines the structure of the essay with respect to the question, and provides a brief summary of the argument you are going to make (in other words, to what extent do you think that modernist, postmodern, and symbolic interpretative approaches to OT are complementary or competing paradigms)?
The body of the text should be divided roughly in two. About half to two-thirds should be focused on describing modernist, postmodern and symbolic interpretative approaches to OT. Remember you must focus on providing information that directly answers the question. One implication of this is that you may wish to discuss the broad economic, social and political context for the development of modernist and post-modernist theory, for example, but you must focus especially on describing and analysing the related organisation theories.
The second half to one-third of the main body of the text should be devoted to discussing whether these are competing or complementary paradigms. There is no right or wrong answer here but your position must be clearly argued. You were/will be given ideas in the lectures towards the end of term about how you could answer this.
The essay must finish with a conclusion. This should summarise the argument you have made in the essay, especially as to whether these different approaches to OT are complementary or competing.
The marking rubric will reflect this advice in other words you will be awarded marks depending on whether your essay broadly fits with this structure and so feels well balanced (amongst other aspects, such as content, accuracy, spelling, punctuation and grammar, etc.).
Once you have completed the essay, read it carefully or give it to somebody else to read. Can somebody with little or no prior knowledge of organisation theory understand your argument? Are there gaps in the narrative? Is it logical and coherent? Does it answer the question? Edit your essay accordingly this is often the most important part of good essay writing.
Focus too on using paragraphs to help you develop your argument. Use paragraph breaks as you move on to each new point. Try not to make these transitions too abrupt. For example, if switching from a discussion of the theories, to the degree to which they are competing or complementary, tell the reader that is what you are doing. For example:
Having described the different paradigms within organisation theory, I shall now turn to whether these are competing or complementary.
*These books are on your reading list for next terms MN1705 Organisation Studies course, led by
Professor Christopher Grey, so reading them now will give you a head start.
For the most part, the best essays start with a good plan! You are recommended to start with a plan which outlines what you will say and how you will develop your argument. Again, you may want to try explaining this to yourself this out loud (to yourself or a friend)! If you can explain what you are trying to say clearly to somebody else, it suggests that you have a good understanding. If you cant, it may suggest something else in which case, do more reading, go back to your lecture notes, and/or consult your workshop tutor or course leader.
Please stay within the word count of 2,000 words. This excludes the bibliography but includes references within the text. There is a tolerance of c.10% either side of the word count. If you go outside this tolerance, this will be reflected in your marks.
Many of your formative assignments did not use the Harvard referencing system correctly, and sometimes, at all. If you received feedback to this effect, please seek help from our information consultant, Sian Downes, for advice and support. If you fail to reference properly in your summative assignment, you will lose marks.
DO NOT refer to internet sources such as MBA.com; mindtools.com; study.com; or anything similar. You will be penalised in the marking scheme if you do so. This is because internet sites such as this are unreliable and not suitable for academic work. You must use academic sources such as those listed above.
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.[order_calculator]