The set of New York Times articles report on the experience of immigrants, both legal and illegal, in the United States. They document the determination of people to find a better life, despite great hardships: discrimination, fear of being caught and deported, difficult working conditions and low wages, missing home and family back home. The children of immigrants both those who came with parents, and those born here have a particularly difficult experience in being socialized in two cultures.
The assignment is to analyze the experience of immigrants from a sociological perspective using theories studied in the second part of this course, particularly theories from the micro or individual level. This includes the theories of Simmel, Mead, Du Bois, and Hill-Collins. While you may also use some of the theory from Marx, Weber or Durkheim, an individualist theoretical perspective must be part of your theoretical framework.
Here are some suggestions for orienting questions and theoretical frameworks for your analysis.
1. Immigrants seem to fit Simmels conceptualization of The Stranger. As well, Simmels theory of interaction, and its forms, provides a foundation for understanding why immigrants have difficulty becoming part of the host society. Analyze the immigrant experience according to Simmels conceptualization, and discuss the consequences both for the immigrant and the larger society he/she is now a member of.
2. As well as being a Stranger, Mexican immigrants in the United States also seem to be separated from the larger host society by a veil, as conceptualized by W.E.B Du Bois. What constitutes this veil; why does it exist; what are the consequences for both the immigrants and the larger society they live and work in but which tries to keep them separate?
3. Meads symbolic interaction theory of socialization and the development of self seem particularly useful in analyzing the plight of immigrant children. What is the impact of being socialized by two cultures (for example, the Mexican culture of their parents and the wider U.S. culture that they are growing up in), especially when the latter is often hostile to the former? How might a child of immigrants self develop when he or she encounters negative responses from the larger society?
4. Feminist Theory contributes to understanding why and how the host society deals with and treats immigrants, especially those labeled unwanted and illegal. For example, feminist theory elaborates on Marxs concept of exploitation to explain why and how dominant groups both take advantage of and mistreat subordinate groups. These perspectives might be particularly helpful in analyzing the contradictory stance on immigrants: relying on the necessary labor of immigrants, while paying them very low wages, affording no benefits, and in general treating them like criminals. Hill-Collins concept of the matrix of domination might also be useful in analyzing the condition of female immigrants.
5. Any of the above theories and/or orienting questions can be combined for a really sophisticated analysis.
Remember, these are suggestions. You may address them as is, modify and/or combine them, or come up with your own orienting question and theoretical framework.
You should present your research question/problem and thesis statement at the beginning of your paper, in the introduction. The introduction should also include a brief outline of the paper, including a statement about what theoretical framework you will be using and the analytic argument you will make.
Include a brief (no more than 1 page) discussion/description of the immigrant experience, and the social factors shaping it. This may come before or after, or even mixed in with the Introduction.
There are various possible approaches; two main ones are:
1. Use one theory for your analysis. Maybe you think Meads symbolic interaction theory explains most everything about the experience of immigrants.
2. Generally, real life cannot be explained with one theory. Use various theories, maintaining theoretical logic, to construct your theoretical framework. For example, if you are looking analyzing the mistreatment of immigrants, you might start with a Conflict theory to set the social structural foundation, and then use Simmels concept of the Stranger to look at the more specific individual experience of immigrants.
Whichever way you put together your theoretical framework, you must present a thorough discussion of it. This includes stating why you think it is appropriate and what specific parts (concepts, processes, dynamics, etc.) of the theories are relevant. You must also define concepts used, and explain the theoretical logic (especially if you are combining theories). For example, Du Bois theory of double consciousness builds on Meads theory of the development of self through interaction, and helps explain why immigrants feel inferior in the U.S.
The analysis of the sociological issues of immigration, your specific research question, and the information you use from the articles will be based on applying the theoretical framework you have developed. A strong analysis will not only be based on the theoretical logic in general, but will be conceptually specific. For example: If you are using Simmels concept of the Stranger, specify who is the stranger is, and why (difference, not born here, etc.). The analysis will also be specific in terms of both the theory and the information from the articles.
Avoid vague statements of either theory or evidence.
Remember that quotes dont speak for themselves, they must be interpreted and/or their relevance to your argument must be made explicit.
Do not editorialize in your analysis
Use and refer to at least three articles in your analysis.
Your conclusion may consists of several things: a summary of your argument; a statement about how the particular theories or concepts are useful for analyzing the problems individuals and communities confront with immigration; your opinion (based on the analysis); or larger social issues that your analysis of immigration implicates. These are only suggestions.
Style Guidelines/Mechanics for Paper
1. Any recognized academic style is fine, as long as consistency is maintained including citations, foot or endnotes, bibliography or reference page.
2. Font size: 12
3. Double spaced
4. Length: 7-10 pages
5. Bibliography/Reference page required but not included as part of this length.
6. Citations. Any work or author mentioned must be cited including name, year of publication, page number (especially if quoting, see below #8).
For example (Brown, 1997, pp.23-25)
7. Websites must be cited (however, use of websites is discouraged and I will check for plagiarism).
8. Refer to style manuals if unclear about citations, or other style issues
9. Quotations: you may use quotes from either the newspaper articles or readings. These should be rather short quotes, and must include the appropriate citation. I encourage quotes, as they can be very good support for analysis and argument; however, no more than three or four quotes should be used.
10. Paper must have either Bibliography (includes full citations of all works used in paper), or Reference page (includes full citations of works/authors mentioned in paper).
11. Pages must be numbered.
12. Title page: with paper title, name, course name
13. Check for typos, misspellings, incomplete sentences and improper grammar. I will deduct points for these. All word processing programs contain a spelling and grammar check, so there is no excuse
14. Edit paper. Do not turn in first draft. Read, edit, and revise as needed.
Are you looking for a similar paper or any other quality academic essay? Then look no further. Our research paper writing service is what you require. Our team of experienced writers is on standby to deliver to you an original paper as per your specified instructions with zero plagiarism guaranteed. This is the perfect way you can prepare your own unique academic paper and score the grades you deserve.
Use the order calculator below and get started! Contact our live support team for any assistance or inquiry.[order_calculator]